home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT2822>
- <title>
- Oct. 29, 1990: The Generation Gap
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- Oct. 29, 1990 Can America Still Compete?
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 40
- The Generation Gap
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> Whatever budget agreement finally emerges from Congress and
- the White House, it can be counted on to continue the rapid
- growth in spending for Social Security and other programs for
- those 65 and older. Which means that it is almost certain to
- widen the gap between what the government spends on the elderly
- and what it spends on children.
- </p>
- <p> Nearly half of all nonmilitary federal spending is devoted
- to people 65 and over. That in itself is hardly objectionable.
- For many years, the elderly had the nation's highest rate of
- poverty, a situation no caring society should tolerate. But
- since 1983 they have had the lowest, thanks largely to federal
- largesse. The problem is that spending on the elderly has
- become indiscriminate. Unlike most programs targeted at the
- young, which are open only to the poor, virtually none of the
- spending on the old is similarly means-tested. It goes equally
- to millionaires and to the poorest widow. Yet while only 5%
- of the elderly have incomes below the official poverty level
- of $5,947 for a single person and $7,501 for a couple, 1 child
- in 5 lives in poverty. Even some senior citizens' groups have
- started paying lip service to the need to trim spending on
- affluent older people to free up funds for nutrition, schooling
- and health care for impoverished kids. One obvious way:
- subjecting Social Security and Medicare to means-testing so
- that benefits would be pegged to a recipient's ability to pay
- for the services independently. Another option is to fully tax
- Social Security benefits for those earning more than a certain
- amount (say $40,000). This would protect the poor while curbing
- government handouts to those who hardly need them.
- </p>
- <p> Such suggestions, however, go unheard in the storm of
- protest that erupts whenever anyone even raises these ideas.
- Politicians would sooner face Iraqi tanks than irate seniors,
- whose favorite form of low-impact aerobics is pulling the lever
- in voting booths. Nearly 61% of Americans 65 and over voted in
- 1986, compared with about 22% of those between the ages of 18
- and 24. Meanwhile, the American Association of Retired Persons,
- with 31 million members and a 1988 budget of $236 million, is
- among the most powerful lobbies on Capitol Hill. Alongside it
- is the even more militant National Committee to Preserve Social
- Security and Medicare. Last year the 5 million-member
- organization led the successful fight to repeal the surtax that
- Congress had imposed on the Social Security benefits of
- wealthier recipients to finance catastrophic health insurance
- for all older people.
- </p>
- <p> Few in Congress have forgotten the moment during the surtax
- fight when a crowd of Chicago retirees mobbed the car of Dan
- Rostenkowski, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.
- To avoid being mobbed in the same way on Election Day, Congress
- has declined to inflict much pain on its older constituents.
- As for children--they don't vote.
- </p>
- <p>By Richard Lacayo. Reported by Dan Goodgame/Washington.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-